Pages

Monday, September 30, 2013

Moby Grape-Moby Grape

Moby Grape
So much has been written about Moby Grape (we'd be talking REAMS if it were all on paper, but these days we're more likely talking mega-megabytes, I guess) that it's next to impossible to come up with anything close to an original insight on this legendary group. So allow me a personal reflection, if you would. I was a mere slip of 15 year old when this record was released and a budding music freak, scarfing up everything I could get my hands on that got even a remotely favorable review in CRAWDADDY or HIT PARADER (ROLLING STONE was just getting off the ground in '67, of course, and had yet to make an appearance in my hometown).

Back in those days, HIT PARADER, under the editorial leadership of a guy named Jim Delahant, was actually a pretty cool magazine and a great source of info about all the San Francisco bands--and they raved about Moby Grape and about MOBY GRAPE (the album). Not only that, they printed the lyrics of all five simultaneously released singles in their song lyrics section--as though they actually were HITS (which, of course, they famously were not). So for this boy, the first album was a must-have, but really only one of many from that Summer of Love and the autumn that followed. (Others included, of course, THE DOORS, STRANGE DAYS, SURREALISTIC PILLOW, FREAK OUT, YOUNGER THAN YESTERDAY and, of course, the Meisterstueck SERGEANT PEPPER.)

I loved the record from the get-go, but my fevered 15 year old brain (come to think of it, I was actually still 14 when I picked this one up) I felt it wasn't all that experimental or innovative. From everything I'd been reading about the music coming out of San Francisco, this seemed more like straight-ahead rock'n'roll than truly freaky stuff. Oh, sure, you got a little distortion at the opening of "Omaha" and some of the lyrics were fashionably obscure in that Dylanesque way that everybody and his brother and sister were emulating at the time. But where were the 15 minute jams? (We'd have to wait til the sophomore effort for those.) These songs were not just tight: they were punchy and SHORT. ' Course in hindsight, that's hardly a bad thing at all.

Sometime around the mid-fall of that year, in fact, I realized that despite all the groovy experimentalism of the Beatles. the Doors and Zappa, say, THIS was the record I was playing most frequently. That was a bit of an eye-opener (or EAR opener). Maybe I wasn't quite the budding avant-gardista I imagined myself to be. All I knew was that this was GREAT stuff.

We all know about the bad luck and troubles that ensued. It seemed that the group named for the punchline of a typically 60s absurd joke went through a ton of, uh, stuff that wasn't at all funny. Something wound up harpooning Moby Grape, and it was likely not JUST the bad management and marketing. The group's history seems to be one perfect storm of troubles and misfires.

I started this review by suggesting that everything that there was to say about the this beleaguered group's history had already been said. But actually, one hypothesis that hasn't been explored sufficiently--as far as I know--would be the claim that the group's very unity, their tightness, professionalism and their emphasis on polished instrumentation may have actually worked against them. The three guitar sound, the strong shared vocals actually made it impossible to speak of a dominant figure or STAR within the band's ranks. We tend to forget how star-struck a generation we really were, but the big guns of the era really were the bands that featured a VERY prominent individual (or two or three, in the case of the Beatles). Moby Grape could not boast a Lennon, a Morrison, a Jagger, Joplin or a Slick. In some ways, they were even more "communal" than the Dead (whose central figure even then was Jerry Garcia, who could boast of maybe a kind of anti-charisma).

Moby Grape could boast of top notch vocalists (really! give 'em a listen) and great guitar work, but the glam-quotient was lacking. Does't count that one of the band members was the son of a movie star. And even though two members would eventually be diagnosed with schizophrenia (and what are the odds of THAT,even among hippie freaks), Moby Grape's MUSIC was not OUT THERE in the most outre sense of the term. Nowadays that scarcely seems like a weakness. This album has aged better than 90% of the product of that era. Musicianship matters.

I guess my timing was off in one way. I seemed to have missed out on the re-mastered, expanded Sundazed version that briefly saw the light of day a few years ago, and while that seems to be available in downloadable form still, and for those for whom that's an option, I'd say, go for it. This version, on Mr. Katz's imprint, is also too pricey (and reportedly no revenues from its sale are actually going to the surviving band members). I can see why some die-hard fans recommend NOT buying this particular version of this historic album. There are authorized "best of" collections out there, the sales of which will benefit group members. Still this record exerts its own special appeal--and it goes beyond mere nostalgia. Moby Grape's first album was near perfect AS AN ALBUM, near perfect from start to finish.


Thursday, September 12, 2013

They Might be Giants - Apollo 18

Apollo 18
This CD is awesome to say the least; it's meant to be played on "shuffle" due to the fact that there are twenty songs titled "Fingertips" and they're all less than a minute long. If you were to play the CD on standard like I did the first time I listened to it, then you'd notice that once you reach these songs and they start playing back to back, your mind will explode due to the insanity!!! Therefore, when you play them on shuffle, these songs get mixed into the album's full-length song set list. This creates an album that it unique every time you listen to it. My top favorites from the album are "My Evil Twin", "I Palindrome I (the opening lyrics remind me about how my childhood was like...)", "Mammal", "The Guitar" and the last Fingertips song (because of it's sound which resembles drifting through space). To sum everything up, this album is a real treat and I have yet to grow tired of listening to it; oh! And I forgot to mention, this album is very upbeat which means that if you're ever in that mood of which we all call "depression", then listening to this should (in theory) bring you out of it... the depression... 

Thursday, September 5, 2013

The Moody Blues -Time traveler

Time traveler
Almost 5 hours worth of trippy moody blues music for the all day buzz. Although I can say I have not listened to this box set from D1 to D5 (Bonus) back to back, I have listened to all discs several times individually, Disk 3 is my favorite.
 
This sprawling 71-track, 4-disc set is all the Moody Blues most fans will ever need. First released in 1994, the first two-and-a-half discs focus on the Moodies classic period (1967-1972) with the lineup of Justin Hayward, John Lodge, Mike Pinder, Ray Thomas and Graeme Edge. During that time they released seven albums:

DAYS OF FUTURE PASSED (disc-1, tracks 4-5)

IN SEARCH OF THE LOST CHORD (disc-1, tracks 6-11)

ON THE THRESHOLD OF A DREAM (disc-1, tracks 12-20)

TO OUR CHILDREN'S CHILDREN'S CHILDREN (disc-2, tracks 1-9)

A QUESTION OF BALANCE (disc-2, tracks 10-15)

EVERY GOOD BOY DESERVES FAVOUR (disc-2, tracks 16-20)

SEVENTH SOJOURN (disc-3, tracks 1-6)

It's no surprise that this box set leans heavier on these seven albums as they form the foundation of this band that has continued to sporadically record even ten years after this set was first issued. [Their most recent recording is 2003's holiday album DECEMBER.] The rest of disc-3 and disc-4 cherry pick highlights from the band's next twenty years culminating with three tracks from their then latest album, 1991's KEYS OF THE KINGDOM. There are also a few tracks from Hayward and Lodge's Bluejays project (disc-3, tracks 7-12) and two Hayward singles, "Blue Guitar" and "Forever Autumn," the latter from JEFF WAYNE'S THE WAR OF THE WORLDS.

There are few bonus or rare tracks. Disc-1 starts with two non-album singles, "Fly Me High" and "Love and Beauty," both released in 1967 and failed to dent the UK charts. [Missing is their 1966 UK single "Boulevard De La Madelaine."] "Cities" is the non-album B-side of "Nights in White Satin." The only other bonus track is "Highway," an outtake from the KEYS OF THE KINGDOM sessions that closes disc-4. [Note: The original pressings of this box set had a fifth disc which included a new recording "This Is the Moment" and eight songs recorded live at Red Rocks with the Colorado Symphony Orchestra in 1992.]

This box fills a nice niche for fans who want more than a greatest hits package, but don't have the deep pockets to purchase all of their studio albums. While there are those that would argue that their albums need to be heard in their entirety, this is a very satisfying look at the first twenty-five years of an amazing band. VERY HIGHLY RECOMMENDED

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Roger Waters-Pros and Cons of Hitchiking

The Pros and Cons of Hitchiking
I expect that everyone who's listened to this album, or is a fan of Roger Waters, is at least somewhat familiar with the music of Pink Floyd. Therefore, most of them compare "Pros and Cons" to Waters masterworks like "Final Cut" and "The Wall." I won't. I'm just going to write this for the music lover who's been directed to this page by a "best of" list of friend's recommendation.
Most importantly, "Pros and Cons of Hitch Hiking" is a concept album in the ultimate sense. This means that it is not actually twelve different tracks that go together -- it means that the entire album is really one long track, telling one story. It includes a multitude of sound effects and imbedded dialogue to enhance the narrative. Many musical chords are used repeatedly in various parts of the album to reinforce the cohesiveness. It is virtually impossible to appreciate "Pros and Cons" without sitting down and listening to it all the way through at least a dozen times. Like all of Roger Waters' work, he requires his listener to put as much thought into the album as he did. Minor problems do crop up. For instance, it's a godsend that the lyrics are included with the album, as well as the dialogue, because some of it is quite difficult to understand with no outside reference. Then there's the usual problem with Waters work: if you don't pay full attention, you WILL NOT "GET IT." I can't put it any more clearly. Waters demands your full participation. Also, some portions of the music don't run quite as deep as the lyrics. This makes the album as a whole seem shallower than it really is.... And sometimes, if you're not in a patient mood, some parts seems to drag on.
The execution of the music is flawless, though! Mr. Waters is an accomplished bassist. The Legendary Eric Clapton is lead guitarist (and if you don't know Floyd, I have to assume that you must know at least SOMETHING by Clapton...) Michael Kamen plays the piano and conducts the London Philharmonic Orchestra. So despite showing signs of lacking in musical composition, the performance of the material gives it an operatic quality. Roger Waters himself gives a go-for-broke vocal performance that quickens the strain of the protagonist's conflict. I think the main reason that this album is a bit obscure (except among true Floyd and Waters fans) is that there really are no tracks that could be marketed as radio singles. As I've mentioned before, the entire album is the only track on the disc. But for posterity's sake, I'll say that there are a few cuts that might have made excellent singles. "Sexual Revolution," "Every Stranger's Eyes," and the title track may have made it... But stripped of the album's context, they do in fact lose some of their power. What really kills me is that I can't think of a single other artist to whom I can compare this album. It has a quite different sound from classic Pink Floyd, and Roger Waters' later work is even a little more audience-accessible than "Pros and Cons." I'd say that it could possibly be just summed up as a "country rock opera." I do think that you would not enjoy this album quite as much unless you first go back and investigate some of Pink Floyd's earlier work. "The Wall" and "Final Cut" are absolute essentials in Roger Waters ouevre, and listening to them would help considerably in appreciating this. If you like those, then you'll probably appreciate this album a bit more. Definitely don't make this your first Roger Waters purchase. "Amused to Death" is a much more polished work. If you want a good overview of his work, try his "In the Flesh" live album. Then move on to "Pros and Cons."


Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Captain Beefheart-Clear Spot / Spotlight Kid

Clear Spot / Spotlight Kid

The Spotlight Kid/Clear Spot captures EVERYTHING great about this guy. Not a single weakpoint anywhere.
 
I'll say this- even though the best material here doesn't quite excite me on the same level as the best stuff from Trout Mask Replica, I'd say these two albums combined to make one SUPER disc is actually *more* consistent and entertaining to me personally than Trout Mask Replica the entire way through. But nothing here reaches the high points of say, "When Big Joan Sets Up".
Let's face it- while groundbreaking, TMR isn't exactly the easiest music in the world to get into.
I believe Spotlight Kid/Clear Spot is an easier listen, if only ever so slightly (or maybe I've finally gotten used to the Captain's style and went into this album expecting more of the same, and if you happen to be in the same boat as me -hearing TMR before this one- perhaps you'll find the music fairly easy to get into yourself).
 
The Spotlight Kid captures Captain Beefheart in his insanely creative and brave career period, when he was dabbing in wild experiments and not afraid to hold *anything* back. The guitar riffs, the harmonica that occasionally comes out of nowhere giving the music a southern blues feel, the lyrics that are constantly out of place, and yet, all these things come together and fit in perfectly despite the initial impression that nothing works.
 
His lyrics are written in a way where anyone can get into them, but don't expect them to be anything approaching normal either. He constantly finds ways to throw tricky words into his music, perhaps doing so deliberately as a way to be different from your ordinary normal way most musicians write lyrics.
 
THIS is a fantastic album, and THIS is why I love the good Captain as much as I do. Once you get into this style, you'll learn to appreciate what he's doing and gradually adjust to his HIGHLY unusual and completely unique way of putting a song together.
 
Clear Spot shows signs of Captain Beefheart attempting to write more accessible music, though only on a couple occasions. For the most part the music is quite twisted and strange in the same way as Spotlight Kid and even Trout Mask Replica. Just ignore "Too Much Time" and you'll be alright. While a decent song, it sounds VERY out of place if you ask me.